Comments on: Continued Greed: ANS Pursues Marshall Estate Three Years After Her Death

By: doris jean

doris jean — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:05:22 +0000

Mary, the father was himself an attorney and he did leave a Will. After he married he did protect his family, he did make clear legal arrangements for his family. He gifted Ana Nicole with millions while he was alive, and he made a clear Will with the intent that his estate go to his son. The Will was attacked by Ana Nicole because she wanted even more money. He did provide for her. Didn’t he give her an eight million dollar ranch and millions more in other gifts such as expensive cars and valuable jewelry? The Texas probate court had a trial and ruled that she was not entitled to anything from the Will.

I do not feel sorry for Dannielynn the daughter. If her mother had kept the millions she received, the child would now be a millionaire.

Is the money hidden away somewhere so that Howard Stern will eventually spend it? Did Larry Birkhead get a large part of it already paid to him by Howard Stern? Did doctors who prescribed drugs to Ana Nicole get lots of money? Maybe some answers will come out in the pending criminal trials.

By: charlie

charlie — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:56 +0000

this case has so many twists and turns to it that it becomes difficult to sort out all of the claims…..somehow…i would like to see the baby protected financially…God! The greed that prevails in this case is ridiculous.

By: SheStone

SheStone — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:41:46 +0000

Mary, he protected his estate through proper estate planning in such a way that a prenup wasn’t necessary. ANS already lost in probate. She doesn’t get anything from her dead husbands estate.

What the case would currently do is take money from the estate of Marshall’s son, based on a claim of ANS that has no proof other than her word. It is a case against Pierce Marshall, claiming he interferred with her getting a gift from her husband. So a prenup has nothing to do with the still remaining case. JMO

By: Mary

Mary — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:20:12 +0000

Janice, really appreciate the way you explained this case.

My question is shouldn’t the father have protected his family with a prenuptial? I don’t feel the same way about the fear of Americans due to I feel this case is more about poor estate planing. When the father remarried and did not protect his family shows the public a lot. I just don’t know about this case and the feeling the wife did something wrong when bottom line is the older man went into a marriage without making arrangements for his wife after his death. He was the wealthy one with lawyers, he had to know what he was doing so why leave the family in this situation is the real fear.

By: correction

correction — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:51:03 +0000

*Boesch

By: TX

TX — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:44:27 +0000

Philip Boetch is Vickie Marshall’s principal attorney against Pierce Marshall’s Estate. He filed a lawsuit against Pierce for “torturous interference.” You should talk to Mr. Boetch about the case and his motives to move on with litigation. Of course, Larry Birkhead as the father of Anna’s child wants to continue with the lawsuit as well. He thinks his daughter deserves that money.

By: QV

QV — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:43:30 +0000

I’m cheering for Lady Justice. Marshall made his wishes clear.