There appears to be misleading information floating through cyberspace with regard to Superior Judge David Wesley’s December 11th decision reported in ANS Circus: Driving in Tent Poles Once Again. To begin, a judge’s duties are not tied to the California Medical Board. He is entrusted to rule on the criminal matter at hand. His dismissal to rule on the possibility of having Eroshevich and Kapoor’s licenses’ suspended suggests neither innocence nor guilt. If they are found guilty, then the medical board can revoke their licenses. Information regarding the California Medical Board’s authority is located at http://www.medbd.ca.gov/laws/Index.html.
We will divulge information regarding the December 18th pre-trial motions once details become available.
Bookmark to
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009 at 8:39 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
4 Responses to “An Editorial Note About the ANS Circus”
Or is Judge Wesley hearing the decision by the medical board, who is represented by the AG?
If the AG is representing the medical board who is trying to revoke the licenses, then I think Judge Wesley should listen strongly to the AG, even if his brief did have typos, and consider revocation.
The AG should work harder to represent the medical board and convince Judge Wesley that the public needs protection from these two doctors.
I invite you to share your comments and welcome debate and differing viewpoints. Please note that comments submitted are moderated, and will be reviewed but not edited. I ask that the conversation be kept civil, and that commenters honor the following guidelines:
No baseless attacks that identify individuals, companies, or other organizations.
No discriminatory, defamatory, offensive, libelous, threatening or rude language.
No comments especially long ones, posted on multiple sites for propaganda purposes.
No invasion of privacy; no racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable language.
No material in violation of trademark or copyright laws or other laws.
No irrelevant comments that do not address the topic in the blog post.
No spam, flaming, flooding, advertisements or solicitations.
Whatever the nexus between the judge and the Medical Board, they should not be allowed to practice medicine in CA or anywhere!
as i said in the other posting of this travesty….their licenses should be revoked immediately….
Is Judge Wesley a probate judge?
Or is Judge Wesley hearing the decision by the medical board, who is represented by the AG?
If the AG is representing the medical board who is trying to revoke the licenses, then I think Judge Wesley should listen strongly to the AG, even if his brief did have typos, and consider revocation.
The AG should work harder to represent the medical board and convince Judge Wesley that the public needs protection from these two doctors.