Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor has weathered criticism for ruling along certain racial or socioeconomic lines. Today, this perception has again come to the fore. She previously decided that white firefighters in New Haven, CT were not discriminated against when the city tossed out the results of a promotion exam because too few minorities scored high enough.
Today, the Supreme Court validated the discrimination claim levied by Frank Ricci and his colleagues. Sotomayor’s “blunder” as characterized by many media sources, is summed up here: \”Judicial Malpractice\”
Bookmark to
This entry was posted
on Monday, June 29th, 2009 at 5:59 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
It is obvious…to this layman, that this nominee has a personal agenda with a very dull axe to grind. I fear
that Ms Sotomayor will be the death of
the poor white man who excells being treated fairly.
I think the average village idiot relized that this case was a clear case of discrimination…not reverse discrimination…but discrimination. I
am fearful that once sotomayers appointment to the supremes is realized…i agree with thomas…the white man…especially the hard working white man…will be punished for his endeavors.
God help us from the hidden wrath of the Sotomayer machine. Me thinks it
won’t be long before people realize that a personal agenda is being utilized to prove to the world that this latina woman can make better decisions than a white man. Such arrogance is hard to fathom.
let me make two predictions:
1. Sotomayer will vote to advance affirmative action programs.
2. sotomayer will also vote to reduce t
the power of the second ammendment.
I hope, and i sincerely pray, that i am wrong!!!!!!!!!
I invite you to share your comments and welcome debate and differing viewpoints. Please note that comments submitted are moderated, and will be reviewed but not edited. I ask that the conversation be kept civil, and that commenters honor the following guidelines:
No baseless attacks that identify individuals, companies, or other organizations.
No discriminatory, defamatory, offensive, libelous, threatening or rude language.
No comments especially long ones, posted on multiple sites for propaganda purposes.
No invasion of privacy; no racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable language.
No material in violation of trademark or copyright laws or other laws.
No irrelevant comments that do not address the topic in the blog post.
No spam, flaming, flooding, advertisements or solicitations.
5 to 4 decision by the supremes is hardly clear evidence of a “blunder”
If it’s not color-blind, it is a blunder.
It is obvious…to this layman, that this nominee has a personal agenda with a very dull axe to grind. I fear
that Ms Sotomayor will be the death of
the poor white man who excells being treated fairly.
I think the average village idiot relized that this case was a clear case of discrimination…not reverse discrimination…but discrimination. I
am fearful that once sotomayers appointment to the supremes is realized…i agree with thomas…the white man…especially the hard working white man…will be punished for his endeavors.
God help us from the hidden wrath of the Sotomayer machine. Me thinks it
won’t be long before people realize that a personal agenda is being utilized to prove to the world that this latina woman can make better decisions than a white man. Such arrogance is hard to fathom.
let me make two predictions:
1. Sotomayer will vote to advance affirmative action programs.
2. sotomayer will also vote to reduce t
the power of the second ammendment.
I hope, and i sincerely pray, that i am wrong!!!!!!!!!