Comments on: A Judge Supreme…Will Sotomayor Make History AGAIN

By: dorisjean

dorisjean — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:09:28 +0000

2nd Amendment is extremely important and should never be infringed under any circumstances – period. I hope the congress quizzes her deeply and well on this issue because it is so important to freedom. That is how it got to be at the top (number two) of the constitutional amendments to protect fundamental rights.
It is stated clearly that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Very straight-forward and clear. Needs no interpretation. All judges who misunderstand this should be impeached.
Guns are our defense. Those who use guns aggressively against others should have the law enforced against their misuse. Hire more police detectives, make more jobs for enforcement. Hunt them down and lock them up or execute them for murder. But keep the 2nd amendment intact completely. If one is murdered with a baseball bat, do you make bats unlawful?

By: thomas hill

thomas hill — Fri, 29 May 2009 20:12:18 +0000

i am greatly concerned about this nominees indifference towards the
2nd amendment

By: J-me

J-me — Thu, 28 May 2009 16:34:12 +0000

She seems to be hard-working and well-deserving based on exceeding the limitations of her challenging beginnings.

By: Josh

Josh — Thu, 28 May 2009 07:36:12 +0000

She will likely get confirmed with little difficulty, and a solid majority. No C. Thomas debacle here.

By: TheDecider

TheDecider — Wed, 27 May 2009 12:38:53 +0000

Sotomayor has great accomplishments
Yale Law Review
Princeton top of her class (with top student award)
high school valedictorian

..she’s no Harriet Myers

By: maybelle Conger

maybelle Conger — Wed, 27 May 2009 01:32:53 +0000

Rush limbaugh has my vote for one of the supreme court nominees….

By: DJ

DJ — Wed, 27 May 2009 01:30:54 +0000

Yes, firefighter Macarelli worked long and hard for months and scored the top score on the test. He said it was just “gut-wrenching” when all his hard work was just thrown out because minorities did not study enough to pass. Everyone had an equal right to study, and those who did the work should be rewarded, not punished for those who failed. It’s not fair. (By the way, I’m a minority.)

By: charlie

charlie — Wed, 27 May 2009 01:21:03 +0000

Why is it important that race and gender be an issue for selection to the supremes? In reading about the Frank Ricci case whereby this nominee
could find no reverse discrimination in
the firefighter case….the reverse discrimination suit came about because none of the minorities passed the fire fighters test for advancement…so the promotion was cancelled….her position on gun control is to let states infringe on the 2nd amendment. I have my doubts about this nominee….

By: doris jean

doris jean — Wed, 27 May 2009 01:08:38 +0000

The appointee should be the best judge of any race, sex, color or religion. I do NOT like choosing people based on attributes of birth. We should pick the best person for the job as long as they are human.