As a Los Angeles native I have to admit that following the Anna Nicole Smith saga, a staple of reality television and tabloid news, has been hard to avoid. I continue to see coverage of her life in the tabloids, but after I read some articles on her estate battle with her deceased husband’s family, I became intrigued by the legal intricacies in the case and the shenanigans of Smith and her lawyers. I even wrote a few articles on the subject, which you can find on this blog. The case has been with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals since May 2006. However, just last week there was some movement in the case, instigated by Smith’s former lawyer-turned-beau, Howard K. Stern.
Here’s a quick thumbnail sketch of the case: Smith married the elderly J. Howard Marshall, II in 1994 in Texas; he passed away 14 months later. Smith then discovered that she was not named as an heir in Marshall’s detailed estate plan – having already given her plenty of funds, but left his estate to his son. Undaunted, Smith claimed that, shortly before his death, Marshall told her –and her alone- that he would leave her a sizeable chunk of his estate. While the case was being deliberated in a Texas probate court, Smith hatched a secondary desperate attempt by filing for bankruptcy in a California court. Please note: She did have residency in California – because she never even lived with J. Howard! I digress. Even though the Texas jurors ultimately denied Smith her fantasy inheritance, evidence entered in the Texas case was inadmissible in the California bankruptcy court. Consequently, a judge awarded $447 million to Smith, without having viewed Marshall’s estate plan at all. Confused yet? The California case (called Marshall v. Marshall because she sued under her married name) was eventually appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and it’s been a bloodbath ever since. Over a 10 year+ period, Smith, with Stern’s help, has clogged the courts with tactics using moral, ethical and legal judgment which is questionable at best. Stern also became executor of Anna Nicole’s estate when she died in 2006. On her behalf – or on behalf of the percentage he’d be entitled to if her estate inherited anything- he recently filed an application to the U.S. Supreme Court. This was yet another desperate attempt to overturn the 9th Circuit panel decision and instigate some activity with the Marshall v. Marshall case. Too bad for Stern, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy rejected his efforts on Friday to expedite the action in the 9th Circuit.
You think that’s complicated? The latest revelation in Smith’s mysterious death has pushed Stern from the proverbial frying pan into the fire. The California Attorney General implicated Stern as one of Smith’s drug enablers, and charged him Thursday with six felony counts. Stern, along with two doctors, are alleged to have plied the model and actress with thousands of prescription pills in the months preceding her fatal overdose. After a two year probe involving Stern and Drs. Khristine Eroshevich and Sandeep Kapoor, L.A. County prosecutors had amassed enough evidence through public officials, medical and insurance records and the DEA, to issue a warrant for Stern’s arrest in Whittier, California, with bail set for $20,000. The two doctors were also charged with felonies for their roles in the conspiracy. The charges filed Thursday include unlawfully prescribing a controlled substance and prescribing, administering or dispensing a controlled substance to an addict. Stern faces six felony counts and the doctors face seven each. Each count carries a potential sentence of three years, according to California Attorney General Jerry Brown. The motives behind these nefarious actions remain to be seen, but Brown speculated that the allure of wealth, fame and glamour played some role. In a recent press conference, Brown voiced his strong views on those who “pump innocent and often vulnerable people full of…cocktails of methadone and antidepressants and sleeping pills and Xanax” which inevitably lead to an “explosion.” Brown also referenced video footage of Smith shortly before her death, saying that she was clearly “drugged to the point of stupification” (sic).
Yes, folks, it’s been a busy week for Stern, and it appears the fun has just started. Fame. Power. Drugs. Death. Hollywood history is rife with examples of how this scenario has played out time after time. Paging Lady Justice…it might be soon time to unsheathe that sword once more.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, March 17th, 2009 at 12:21 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
|
Leave a Comment
Comment Policy
I invite you to share your comments and welcome debate and differing viewpoints. Please note that comments submitted are moderated, and will be reviewed but not edited. I ask that the conversation be kept civil, and that commenters honor the following guidelines:
- No baseless attacks that identify individuals, companies, or other organizations.
- No discriminatory, defamatory, offensive, libelous, threatening or rude language.
- No comments especially long ones, posted on multiple sites for propaganda purposes.
- No invasion of privacy; no racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable language.
- No material in violation of trademark or copyright laws or other laws.
- No irrelevant comments that do not address the topic in the blog post.
- No spam, flaming, flooding, advertisements or solicitations.
|
Janice,
Great write up on the ANS case! I have a few questions though. Where is the $447 million now? Is it in probate? In regards to Howard Marshall’s family, isn’t there a family member representing his side? If anything, shouldn’t it go to them or to Anna Nicole’s daughter in a Trust, when she is of legal age?
Thanks for your questions, Melissa. Actually, the 9th Circuit already ruled in favor of the family before Smith appealed it to the U.S. Supreme Court, so it is logical to believe that they will stick to their original decision, namely providing deference to the Texas probate court’s judgment that the money will go to the family as stated in J. Howard Marshall, II’s written will and estate plan.
This is a very clarifying article. It paints a factual picture of this case. The True Hollywood Story on E needs to encorporate this perspective onto their show. I wonder what will happen to Mr. Stern and the doctors. Please keep us posted.
What an interesting article! Can you add additional clarification on how she remained a CA resident and never lived with J. Howard? Did or will J. Howard’s son receive his father’s estate?
I’m looking forward to following the rest of the tale!
I’ll continue to keep you posted on this case and others in California. I agree with you that it would be refreshing to see E! and other entertainment networks, publications and blogs incorporate a broader perspective into their coverage of Anna Nicole Smith and the legal drama associated with her, specifically if they mention the ongoing Marshall v. Marshall case. Maybe they’ll be more critical in their thought after the news of Howard K. Stern’s arrest.
From the court documents I’ve read, Anna Nicole never even officially lived with her husband, and only visited with him a few times during their short marriage. She actually had a sexual harassment lawsuit brought against her by a female employee in California—which Anna Nicole lost. It seems her husband was not a priority for her, except for when she was running low on cash or wanted some new jewelry…Can you believe she actually did receive millions in cash and gifts during their short marriage?!
Regarding the question about whether or not J. Howard’s son Pierce will receive his estate, I must first remind you of two things: 1) Pierce Marshall, J. Howard’s son and heir, has also passed away and his wife continues the case. As I’ve mentioned before, I predict that J. Howard’s rightful heirs (Pierce and his family), as stated in his written will and estate plan, will receive what is rightfully theirs; and, 2) the Texas probate court decided already, and the 9th Circuit moved to uphold the Texas probate court’s jury’s decision that Anna Nicole was not promised a portion of J. Howard’s estate and I believe they will again.
Stay tuned…
I agree with Jami. Would be nice if E! and all of the other celebrity news shows presented their segments objectively. Hollywood is Hollywood, though- it’ll glorify anyone with money or a good story.